Surgical never event injury lawyer

A never event is an incident regarded as so clearly preventable that it should not occur in properly functioning care — surgery on the wrong site, the wrong procedure, the wrong patient, or an item left inside. The designation matters legally, because these are not the recognized risks of treatment that consent addresses. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. handles medical malpractice claims in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York.

On This Page

What the record establishes

The safety systems designed to prevent these events generate their own documentation, and its absence is as informative as its content. The pre-operative verification and site marking record. The surgical safety checklist or time-out documentation, which requires the team to confirm patient, procedure and site before incision. Consent forms, which should identify the correct site and procedure. The operative note. And the institution’s own incident investigation, which frequently exists and frequently identifies exactly what failed.

Why these are treated differently

Consent addresses the recognized risks of a properly performed procedure — bleeding, infection, an imperfect result. It does not address operating on the wrong limb. That distinction is why never events sit outside the usual argument about whether a complication reflects negligence, and why some jurisdictions apply doctrines easing the evidentiary burden where an injury does not ordinarily occur absent negligence.

The consequences

Wrong-site surgery means an unnecessary operation with its own risks and recovery, and frequently a further operation to perform the correct procedure — two anaesthetics, two recoveries, and in some cases permanent consequences from the unnecessary intervention. Wrong-procedure and wrong-patient events carry similar and sometimes worse consequences. The psychological effect of learning that the wrong operation was performed is real, substantial and frequently underweighted.

How these claims are contested

Less on whether it happened, which the record establishes, than on who is responsible among the surgeon, the team and the institution, and on the extent of harm — the argument being that the correct procedure was subsequently performed and the person recovered. That understates two operations, two anaesthetics and the psychological consequence. Where the institution investigated, its own findings are frequently the most useful document in the case.

Building the claim properly

Obtain the verification, site-marking and time-out documentation, and note what is missing as well as what is present. Obtain the consent forms and the operative note. Request the institution’s incident investigation — it may be subject to protections in some jurisdictions, but it is worth pursuing because it frequently identifies the failure precisely. Document the unnecessary procedure and its consequences separately from the correct one, and address the psychological impact formally.

Available insurance coverage

What can be recovered is limited by what coverage exists. The at-fault party’s policy is the starting point, but it is frequently not the only source: the injured person’s own uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, household policies, employer coverage where a vehicle was used for work, umbrella and excess layers, and the coverage of any additional responsible party can all apply. Underinsured coverage typically requires notice and consent before any settlement with the at-fault party — settling first can forfeit it. Identifying every available layer is early work, not closing work.

How damages are categorised and proven

Damages are not a single number that gets negotiated. They are separate categories, each proven by different evidence. Past medical expense is proven by billing records and the reasonableness of the charges. Future medical expense requires a physician’s opinion that the care is reasonably certain to be needed. Lost income is proven by employment and tax records; lost earning capacity is a different and larger question requiring vocational and economic analysis. Non-economic loss — pain, limitation, and the effect on daily life — is proven through the medical record and through testimony from people who can describe specific changes rather than general decline. No one can responsibly tell you what a case is worth before that evidence exists, and any figure offered at the outset is a guess.

Filing deadlines in medical malpractice

Medical malpractice deadlines differ from general personal injury deadlines and differ sharply between states. Virginia: two years under Va. Code § 8.01-243(A), generally accruing at the date of the negligent act, with extensions under § 8.01-243(C) for a foreign object, fraud or concealment, and certain malignancies, subject to an outer limit. Maryland: the earlier of five years from when the injury was committed or three years from when it was discovered, under Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-109, with separate rules for minors, foreign objects and reproductive-organ injuries. The District of Columbia has no malpractice-specific statute; the three-year catch-all at D.C. Code § 12-301(8) applies, with a discovery rule. New Jersey: two years under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, with a discovery rule and an early affidavit-of-merit requirement. New York: two years and six months under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214-a, accruing at the act or omission complained of, with a foreign-object discovery rule and a continuous-treatment toll. These are general periods only; confirm the deadline on your own facts without delay.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a never event?

An incident regarded as so clearly preventable that it should not occur in properly functioning care — wrong-site, wrong-procedure or wrong-patient surgery, and retained foreign objects among them. The designation reflects that these are not inherent risks of treatment but failures of process.

Does my consent form cover this?

No. Consent addresses the recognized risks of a properly performed procedure — bleeding, infection, an imperfect result. It does not consent to the wrong operation on the wrong site. That distinction is precisely why never events sit outside the usual argument about complications.

What is a surgical time-out?

A pause immediately before incision in which the team verbally confirms the patient, the procedure and the site. It exists specifically to prevent these events. Whether it was performed and documented is directly examinable, and its absence from the record is significant.

They did the correct surgery afterward. Does that reduce my claim?

It does not eliminate it. You underwent an unnecessary operation with its own risks, an additional anaesthetic and an additional recovery, and then had to undergo the correct procedure as well. The psychological consequence of learning the wrong operation was performed is also real and compensable.

Who is responsible?

Potentially the surgeon, other members of the operating team, and the institution for its systems and processes. These events almost always involve multiple failures of a system designed with redundancy, which is why more than one party is commonly involved. All should be identified.

Can I get the hospital’s own investigation?

It is worth pursuing. Institutions commonly investigate never events and those reviews frequently identify precisely what failed. Access may be subject to protections that vary by jurisdiction, so it is not always obtainable, but it should be sought rather than assumed unavailable.

Do I still need an expert?

Malpractice claims generally require qualified expert opinion, and pre-suit certification requirements apply in several jurisdictions. That said, never events are among the categories where the departure from the standard is most readily demonstrated, and some jurisdictions apply doctrines easing the burden.

How long do I have to bring a claim?

Malpractice deadlines apply — two years in Virginia and New Jersey, the earlier of five years from injury or three from discovery in Maryland, three years in the District, and two years six months in New York — with specific provisions in several states for foreign-object cases. Have it assessed immediately.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the owner and founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., which has practiced since 1997. He is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with the firm and handle matters alongside him. In 2019 Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee on House Bill 635.

Speak with Mr. Sris

Injury claims are governed by filing deadlines that vary by state and by claim type, and evidence degrades quickly. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747. Consultations are by appointment.

Last reviewed: August 22, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

The information on this page is general and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading it or by contacting the firm. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.