Defective Product Lawyer New York, NY

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Defective Product Lawyer New York, NY





Defective Product Lawyer New York, NY

You purchased a new kitchen appliance from a well‑known retailer in Manhattan. The first time you used it, the motor overheated and the housing fractured, spraying hot metal fragments across your hands and forearms. Instead of a routine evening at home, you were in a Midtown emergency room, facing skin grafts, nerve damage, and weeks away from work. A defective product can upend your life without warning. The New York product liability lawyers at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. help injured consumers hold designers, manufacturers, and sellers accountable when a dangerous product causes serious harm. Reach our New York location at (888) 437‑7747 to request a consultation. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

How Our Firm Approaches Defective Product Claims in New York

A product‑injury case in New York moves beyond the accident scene to engineering reports, supply‑chain records, and complex liability theories. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys approach every defective‑product matter by first identifying all potentially responsible parties. A claim may name the manufacturer who built the product, the component‑part supplier whose part failed, the distributor who placed the item into commerce, or the retailer who sold it to you. New York law recognizes three principal product‑liability theories: strict liability for a manufacturing or design defect, negligence in failing to exercise reasonable care, and breach of express or implied warranties. Each theory carries its own proof requirements and strategic advantages, and the firm evaluates which path best fits your injury.

Because New York applies a pure‑comparative‑fault rule under C.P.L.R. Article 14‑A, a defendant often tries to shift blame onto the injured consumer — arguing the product was misused or that warnings were ignored. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys anticipate those arguments from the outset, gathering manufacturer‑specification documents, recall‑history reports, and safety‑standard records to build a thorough liability record. Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5), a product‑liability personal‑injury claim must be filed within three years of the date of injury. Acting promptly preserves both evidence and legal options.

What to Expect in a New York Product Liability Case

After the firm accepts a defective‑product matter, investigation is the first priority. That includes preserving the failed product in its post‑incident condition, securing maintenance and purchase records, and consulting with engineering or human‑factors attorneys who can explain how the defect caused the injury. The firm’s New York location handles claims venued in the New York Supreme Court for any New York City county — Manhattan (60 Centre St.), Brooklyn (360 Adams St.), Queens (88‑11 Sutphin Blvd., Jamaica), Staten Island (18 Richmond Terrace), or the Bronx (851 Grand Concourse). Because the Supreme Court is a court of general jurisdiction with no monetary cap, the forum accommodates claims of any size.

Once the factual record is sufficient, the firm typically sends a detailed demand package to the defendant’s insurer or legal counsel, outlining liability, medical damages, lost earnings, and non‑economic losses. Many product‑injury cases resolve through negotiation without a trial, but if a fair settlement is not offered, the firm prepares the case for litigation. Discovery in a product case often includes depositions of design engineers, quality‑control personnel, and corporate representatives. Expert testimony is critical — the firm works with experienced accident‑reconstruction and materials‑failure attorney, not with lawyer‑attorneys. The timeline varies by the complexity of the engineering issues and the court’s scheduling, but the firm keeps clients informed at each stage.

Damages Available in Defective Product Cases

New York does not cap compensatory damages in personal‑injury litigation, which means injured consumers may seek recovery for the full scope of their losses. Economic damages include past and future medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, lost wages, and diminished earning capacity. Non‑economic damages compensate for pain, suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and, where applicable, disfigurement. In a product‑liability action that results in a fatality, the personal representative of the decedent’s estate may pursue a wrongful‑death claim under N.Y. E.P.T.L. § 5‑4.1, which carries a two‑year statute of limitations from the date of death.

Because of pure comparative fault, any recovery is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the injured consumer — but a plaintiff who is partially responsible is still entitled to collect the remainder. The firm’s attorneys work to minimize any attribution of consumer fault by presenting clear evidence of the product’s dangerous condition and the defendant’s failure to provide adequate warnings or to correct a known hazard.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Last reviewed: July 2026

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor who has been representing clients for over three decades. He is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York — a five‑jurisdiction platform that allows the firm to handle product‑injury cases that involve parties or evidence across state lines. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova), a measure promoting fairness in family‑law litigation, and that same attention to statutory detail informs his work on complex civil claims.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring experience in personal‑injury litigation, including product‑defect matters. Because product‑liability cases often require coordination with technical attorneys, medical professionals, and insurance carriers, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work collaboratively to develop the evidence necessary to pursue a claim. The firm’s New York location is available by appointment; clients can reach Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys at (888) 437‑7747 to discuss their situation.

Frequently Asked Questions About Defective Product Claims in New York

How long do I have to file a defective product lawsuit in New York?

For a personal‑injury claim arising from a defective product, you generally have three years from the date of injury under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5). If the product defect caused a death, the wrongful‑death statute of limitations is two years from the date of death. Because missed deadlines can bar recovery, it is wise to speak with a defective product lawyer promptly.

What kinds of damages can I recover in a New York product‑liability case?

You may recover economic damages such as medical bills and lost income, as well as non‑economic damages for pain and suffering. New York does not cap compensatory damages, so the amount depends on the severity and permanence of the injury, the cost of future care, and the impact on your ability to work. The pure‑comparative‑fault rule reduces recovery by your own percentage of fault, but you still collect the balance. Punitive damages may be available if the defendant’s conduct was especially egregious.

Who can be held responsible for a defective product?

Potentially any party in the chain of distribution can be held liable, including the manufacturer, a component‑part supplier, a wholesale distributor, and the retailer that sold the product. New York product‑liability law does not require you to sue only the manufacturer; the firm examines the full supply chain to identify all viable defendants. Strict‑liability rules allow a claim against a seller even if the seller did not create the defect.

Do I need a lawyer for a defective product injury?

While you are not required by law to hire a lawyer, product‑liability cases are technically complex and usually depend on expert testimony about design, manufacturing, and safety standards. An experienced product‑liability attorney can preserve the failed product, identify the responsible parties, retain qualified engineering attorneys, and negotiate with corporate insurers. Without legal representation, an injured consumer may accept an offer that does not fully account for future medical needs.

How much does a defective product lawyer cost in New York?

Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. Typically handles product‑liability cases on a contingency‑fee basis, which means clients pay no attorney’s fees unless the firm recovers compensation. The specific percentage is discussed during the initial consultation. Costs related to expert witnesses and court filings are advanced by the firm and reimbursed from any recovery, and the firm explains the fee arrangement in a written agreement before representation begins.

What is strict liability, and how does it help an injured consumer?

Strict liability holds a manufacturer or seller legally responsible for a dangerously defective product without requiring proof of negligence. You must still show the product was defective when it left the defendant’s control, and that the defect caused your injury. That doctrine shifts the focus from what the defendant did wrong to the condition of the product itself, often making a claim easier to prove than a negligence case.

What should I do after a product injures me?

Seek immediate medical attention, preserve the product in its post‑accident condition, and avoid discarding any packaging, instructions, or purchase receipts. Photograph the injury scene, the product, and your injuries if possible. Do not attempt to repair the product or discuss the incident on social media. Contact a defective‑product attorney as soon as practical so that evidence can be secured before the manufacturer or insurer alters or discards it.

How does New York’s comparative‑fault rule affect my product‑injury claim?

Under New York’s pure‑comparative‑fault rule, a consumer who is partially at fault may still recover damages, but the award is reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the consumer. For example, if a jury finds the consumer 20 percent at fault and awards $100,000, the consumer receives $80,000. A defendant will often argue that the consumer misused the product or ignored a warning, so the firm prepares to counter those assertions with product‑design and human‑factors evidence.

Can I sue for a defective medical device or prescription drug?

Yes, injured patients may bring product‑liability claims over defective medical devices, implants, or prescription drugs. These cases often involve federal‑law pre‑emption questions and complex regulatory records, but New York state‑law claims for manufacturing or design defects, as well as failure‑to‑warn claims, remain viable in many circumstances. The firm’s attorneys evaluate whether the manufacturer failed to provide adequate safety information to physicians and patients.

What is the difference between a design defect and a manufacturing defect?

A design defect exists when the product’s very blueprint makes it unreasonably safe, even if it is built perfectly to that design. A manufacturing defect, on the other hand, is an unintended flaw in a particular unit — for instance, a bracket that was not properly welded. Both types of defect can support a strict‑liability claim, but they require different kinds of experienced attorney analysis.

For a full statutory breakdown, see our comprehensive analysis at srislawyer.com.

Schedule a Consultation

Call Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747 to speak with Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys about a defective‑product injury in New York. The New York location is available by appointment. Consultations are arranged by phone, and the firm accepts product‑liability cases on a contingency‑fee basis.

Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. — New York Location. By appointment. Call (888) 437‑7747 to schedule.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.


All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.