Falling object construction site attorney

A struck-by injury on a construction site is a failure of separation. Either work was being carried out above people who should not have been below it, or material that should have been secured was not. A hard hat is designed for incidental contact, not for a tool dropped several storeys or a load released from a hoist, and treating protective equipment as the answer to overhead hazards is itself part of the problem. The party responsible is frequently the trade working above, or whoever was coordinating the two activities — neither of which is usually the injured worker’s employer. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. has practiced since 1997 and handles injury claims in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747.

On This Page

How objects come down

The mechanism determines who is answerable, so it is established before anything else.

Dropped hand tools and small material from an elevated work area with no toe board, debris netting, screening or tool tethering in place.

Material stored at an edge — brick, block, sheet goods, conduit — stacked against a rail, on an unsecured deck, or on a surface that shifted.

Loads released during hoisting or rigging, where a sling, shackle, hook, clamp or the rigging configuration failed, or the load was assembled improperly.

Structural or component collapse — a section of formwork, a scaffold component, a partially secured panel, a suspended ceiling grid.

Objects displaced by other equipment, including material knocked from a level by a lift, a hoist or a moving machine.

Each of these traces to a different failure: housekeeping and screening, storage practice, rigging competence and inspection, temporary works design, or coordination between trades.

The separation that should have existed

The controlling principle on a well-run site is that people are kept out from under active overhead work. That is achieved by sequencing trades so the two activities do not overlap, by establishing and enforcing a controlled access zone beneath elevated work, by physical barricades and signage, and by screening or netting where overlap is unavoidable.

Each of those is a coordination function, which is why the general contractor or construction manager is so often a defendant in a struck-by case even though its own employees may have been nowhere near the incident. Whether it retained that coordination role is established from the prime contract, the subcontracts, the site-specific safety plan and the daily reports — not from what anyone recalls about who was in charge.

The object and the rigging are the evidence

Whatever came down should be preserved, and so should whatever was supposed to hold it. A failed sling, shackle, hook, clamp or connector carries the account of the failure on its surfaces — overload deformation, wear, a manufacturing flaw, or a configuration error visible in how the component was loaded. Rigging is routinely removed from service and discarded after an incident, so it disappears through ordinary practice.

Alongside the hardware: rigging inspection records and load charts, the lift plan where one existed, crane or hoist logs, the qualifications and certifications of the riggers and signal person, equipment maintenance records, and the manufacturer’s rated capacities for the components involved.

The site itself should be photographed before the trades move on — the elevated position the object came from, the presence or absence of toe boards, screening and netting, the barricading of the area below, and the resting position of the object. Written preservation notice should go to the general contractor, the owner, the rigging or crane contractor and any equipment lessor.

Injury pattern and why documentation slips

Struck-by injuries concentrate in the head, neck, shoulders and spine. Traumatic brain injury is common and is frequently under-recorded, because an impact absorbed partly by a hard hat is described in the emergency department as a minor head strike and the visible orthopaedic injury takes precedence.

Axial loading through the cervical and thoracic spine from a vertical impact produces injuries that can present days later. Shoulder and brachial plexus injury from a glancing strike is often attributed to bruising initially. The practical point is that symptoms should be reported and recorded as they emerge rather than tolerated, because a silent interval in the record is later argued as evidence that nothing happened.

What the defense will argue

That the worker entered a barricaded area or ignored signage. That he was not wearing his hard hat, or was wearing it improperly. That the object was dislodged by his own trade. That the injury is minor and the reported symptoms are inconsistent with an impact attenuated by protective equipment. And among the defendants, a contest over which trade controlled the overhead work and which contract allocated the coordination duty.

Answers come from the physical evidence, the daily reports and sign-in logs establishing who was working where, the photographs of barricading as it actually existed, and the medical record read as a sequence. Comparative and contributory fault rules differ significantly between the jurisdictions in which the firm practices, with Virginia and the District of Columbia applying notably strict approaches in ordinary negligence claims, so the weight of a conduct argument depends on where the case is brought.

Available insurance coverage

The general contractor and each subcontractor carry commercial general liability coverage, commonly with additional-insured endorsements running between them, and an excess or umbrella layer typically sits above. A crane or rigging contractor carries its own coverage, often with higher limits given the exposure. Equipment lessors and component manufacturers carry liability and products coverage. An owner may carry its own policy, and a larger project may run under a wrap-up covering several parties. The workers’ compensation carrier is a claimant against any recovery rather than a source of one. Certificates of insurance are not policies; declarations pages and complete forms with endorsements determine who actually responds.

Filing deadlines

Every injury claim is governed by a statute of limitations, and the periods differ by state and by claim type. For personal injury actions the period is two years in Virginia under Va. Code § 8.01-243(A), accruing at the date of injury; three years in Maryland under Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101; three years in the District of Columbia under D.C. Code § 12-301(8); two years in New Jersey under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2; and three years in New York under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5). These are general periods. Discovery rules, tolling for minors and incapacity, claims against government entities — the District imposes a six-month notice-of-claim requirement for claims against the District government — and claim-specific statutes can shorten or extend them. Do not rely on a general period for your own case; have the deadline confirmed on your facts.

The workers’ compensation notice and filing deadlines are much shorter than the general injury period and are the ones most often missed. Where a public entity owned the project or the adjacent roadway, a notice-of-claim requirement may be shorter still. Both should be identified in the first days.

Frequently Asked Questions

I was wearing a hard hat. Does that mean my injury cannot be serious?

No. Hard hats are designed to protect against incidental contact and to spread a modest impact; they are not designed for a tool dropped several storeys or a load released from a hoist. Serious brain and cervical spine injury occurs regularly in workers who were wearing them correctly, and the argument that protective equipment must have prevented harm should be expected rather than accepted.

Who is responsible when something falls from above?

Usually the trade performing the overhead work, and often the general contractor or construction manager who was responsible for coordinating trades and keeping people out from under active work. A rigging or crane contractor may be responsible where a load was released, and a component manufacturer where hardware failed. Responsibility is established from the contract documents and the daily records, not from what people remember about who was in charge.

What should be preserved after a struck-by incident?

The object itself and anything that was supposed to secure it — slings, shackles, hooks, clamps and connectors — uncleaned and unrepaired. Rigging is routinely removed from service and discarded after an incident, so this needs written notice immediately. Photographs of the elevated position, the barricading as it actually was, and the object where it came to rest should be taken before the trades move on.

Nobody barricaded the area. Does that establish liability?

It is significant evidence rather than an automatic answer. Keeping workers out from under active overhead work is a core coordination function, and its absence points to whoever held that responsibility. Whether a duty was owed to you specifically depends on the contract documents and the law of the state, and the defense will argue about what was in place and what you knew.

My symptoms started days later. Is that a problem?

It is common and it is manageable if documented. Cervical and thoracic injuries from axial loading, and cognitive symptoms from a head impact, frequently emerge after the initial presentation. What causes difficulty is not the delay itself but an unrecorded delay. Report symptoms as they appear so they enter the medical record and can be evaluated against the mechanism.

Can I claim if the object was dropped by someone from my own company?

A claim against your own employer or a co-employee is ordinarily barred by workers’ compensation. But that does not close the analysis, because the coordination failure that put you beneath active overhead work may rest with the general contractor, and equipment or rigging failure may reach a lessor or manufacturer. Who dropped the object is not the same question as who is answerable for the exposure.

What is a controlled access zone?

It is a defined area beneath or around elevated work from which workers not engaged in that work are excluded, established by barricading, signage and sequencing. Whether one existed, where its boundaries were, and whether it was enforced are questions of fact answered by photographs, daily reports and witness accounts from every trade on site rather than only your own crew.

How do I get records held by companies I do not work for?

Written preservation notice first, to the general contractor, the owner, the rigging or crane contractor and any equipment lessor, so that records cannot be discarded in the ordinary course. Formal discovery follows once a claim is brought. Any regulatory inspection of the incident generates a file containing statements and photographs taken while the scene was intact, and that file is obtainable independently.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the owner and founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., which has practiced since 1997. He is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with the firm and handle matters alongside him. In 2019 Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee on House Bill 635.

Speak with Mr. Sris

Rigging and dropped material are discarded within days of a struck-by incident, and the workers’ compensation deadlines run well ahead of the injury limitations period. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747. Consultations are by appointment.

Last reviewed: August 24, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

The information on this page is general and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading it or by contacting the firm. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.